Sunday, April 26, 2009
Tuesday, July 25, 2006
Muhammad Haque responds to Crossrail hole Bill MPs
Editor in Chief
Muhammad Haque
9th Edition published from London at 2100 Hrs GMT / 2200 Hrs UK time on Tuesday 25 July 2006
AADHIKAR means RIGHTS. It is a transAsian word, devised into English by the Editor in 1980 when founding the publication that was initially a printed weekly published from London E1. AADHIKARonline is part of the AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION London UK. The entirety of the journalistic and historic creations of the Foundation is dedicated to the cause of education. No part of these materials must be used for commercial, trading, bartering or similar aims objects or purposes whatever. ALL materials carried here are originally created as and when they are published [or as they are dated and timed. These editions are being published from the East End of London in association with the KHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN FOR THE DEFENCE OF THE BRICK LANE AND WHITECHAPEL LONDON E1 AREA and for that of the rest of the East End of London from the attacks plotted in and represented by the CrossRail hole Bill, currently being passed through the UK House of Commons. AADHIKARonline has been published continuously in various modes and media since the very first edition printed and published on Monday 19 December 1980 and all the daily files are now archived. they are accessible by request only.
E-mail AADHIKARonline HERE
AADHIKARonline
London Tuesday 25 July 2006
publishing programme during Tuesday 25 July 2006
Khoodeelaar! The first Response to the ‘announcement of interim decisions’ by the Crossrail hole Bill Select Committee of MPs in the UK House of Commons on Tuesday 25 July 2006 Khoodeelaar! constitutional law challenge UPDATE at 2100 Hrs GMT Tuesday 25 July 2006 to Crossrail hole Bill Minister – [Transport Department urges Khoodeelaar! for delay in filing court case ] [A report on that to be posted here on Wednesday 26 July 2006]
By Muhammad Haque, 2050 Hrs GMT Tuesday 25 July 2006Brick Lane London E1
The Court challenge against the CrossRail hole Bill is now going to include in the same application a series of claims against the UK House of Commons Crossrail hole Bill Select Committee. This follows the availability, this evening [25 July 2006] of the evidence of the crassness with which the ‘Crossrail Bill ‘Select committee has been abused by the promoters of the crass CrossRail plot.As I pointed out way back in January 2006, when even the local MP George Galloway was himself absent from this constituency, and neither the ‘local press’ nor the ‘opposition councillors’ on the then Tower Hamlets Council nor any holder of any other ‘elected office’ in the name of this area was saying anything of substance in the context of the plot by Crossrail against the Eats End of London, the Blair regime’s appointment of the token ‘select committee’ was not at all acceptable as evidence of any sustainable claim that the UK Parliament was acting in a constitutionally sovereign way. legitimate, independent or sovereign way that Dicey had sought to paint it to be prone to be doing at most times >br>Having suffered the further spectacles of the illegitimate behaviour by the Crossrail plot promoters in Committee Room 5 ['Palace of Westminster' !] during June 2006 [which was when I had to do some necessary field work that included my witnessing of some of the typical antics of the illegitimate Crossrail hole plot actors], I can now see just why we have to mount the wider programme of legal challenges via the UK courts against the CrossRail hole plotters than we ourselves had thought would be adequate for the defence of the area against this assault when we first worked out the ways in which we would stop the CrossRail attacks on the community. The contents of the relevant ‘decisions’ as ‘announced’ by the crassrail Bill Select committee of MPs today show that far from being interested in hearing what we the community know should be acceptable or would be necessary for our economic, our society, our environment in this ciont4ext, the select committee of MPs has been exposed as the sham that it was from the word go when Tony Blair had had it set up. In the next part of this response to today’s 'Select Committee ‘announcement’ I go into each segment and item of the ‘decisions’ as those affect the future of the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area. I shall then focus on the NEWER expansion of the City of London takeover of the East End that is being facilitated via the same controlling corrupt clique now ‘representing the present Tower Hamlets doing the imposition of the CrossRail hole attack on this area.[To be continued]
From the previous editions:
By Muhammad Haque0540 Hrs GMT Tuesday 25 July 2006
Khoodeelaar! Court action challenging the abuse of the constitution by the Crossrail hole plotters in the Government and in the CLRL company and in the Crossrail Bill ‘select committee’ bureaucracy – updates here during the day
Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique abuses the local community – again. This time its is staging another typically corrupt, inadequate, misleading INSULTATION at the idiotically named Idea Store at Whitechapel on Thursday [27 July 2006] – detailed commentary here shortly
Further KHOODEELAAR! legal questions for ‘Chief Executive’ Christine Gilbert to answer as part of the Khoodeelaar! Claims against her in court – updates here during the day Tuesday 25 July 2006
What crass stunt for Crossrail are we in for during today, Tuesday 25 July 2006 ! – enough of an alert for all visitors to this site and related web sites! Are we all in for another little surprise before the day is out, in the normal plot of things in this context ? !!!
VIEW another page from a recent edition of AADHIKARonline by CLICKING HERE
Files posted on this site are deleted or archived regularly. To access older files, please contact us by e-mail with requests for specific date and topicFrom previous editions as published on 24 July 2006
Monday 24 July 2006
Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill news, events and legal action updates
How Tower Hamlets Council ‘chief executive’ Christine Gilbert lied! How her lying antics were exposed by CBRUK and faced with the challenge caused by her initial backing for the lying role for Crossrail hole plot as played by Michael Keith, Christine Gilbert abused her ‘position’ again and prejudicially, illegally, unlawfully ordered employees concerned of Tower Hamlets Council to obstruct Khoodeelaar! campaign and legal action communications about her [Christine Gilbert's] lying behaviour in backing the CrossRail hole plot against the East End of London
Updates on the Khoodeelaar! court action scheduled to be filed this week
How Councillor Abbas Uddin Helal backed the Crossrail whole project. How he lied against the campaigners. How he lied to the local community in the Brick lane and Whitechapel area and said that the Crossrail hole plot was a ‘good’ plot against the local community! How Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ jumped on the liar mayor Ken Livingstone’s Crossrail-hole bandwagon and signed the lying ‘letter’ in the Evening Standard in February 2004
London Monday 24 July 2006 THE AUTHOR/LCAN 200 IN ASSOCIATION WITH KHOODEELAAR! THE BRICK LANE AND WHIETECHAPEL LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL Legal action - final demand to Christine Gilbert and ‘cllr. Abbas’ for answers to questions about CROSSRAIL HOLE attacks role 24 July 2006 You have been asked questions about the incidents of your making false and untrue and untruthful statements about CrossRail plot against the east end of London. Those questions have been put to you at various times in the past 32 months.
Questions that have been put to Christine Gilbert, ‘chief executive’ of the LONDON BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL have included these1. The questions as put to you by CBRUK in February 2004, March 2004 and April 2004. 2. Why did you write to CBRUK that you had the minutes that showed that the CBRUK assertion that Michael Keith had misrepresented the position of the community was not accurate? 3. If you had the minutes, were those minutes ‘secret’? if they were ‘secret’ then how could you mention those to CBRUK who had made public statement about the publicly established role for CrossRail hole plot as played by Michael Keith? 4. Where are those minutes? 5. What did you ever understand about the community, let alone about its position on anything? 6. what legal justification is there for your continuing to abuse your employment in the LBTH [London Borough of Tower Hamlets] council to violate the rights of the local community and to make it ever more susceptible to attacks, takeovers by big business and interests that have no intention or likelihood of doing anything whatever that significantly makes any positive, lasting, necessary difference to the quality of life for the vast majority of the people who make up the community on whose behalf and in whose interests the Khoodeelaar! Campaign has existed and campaign against your role for Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London? 7. Where are those minutes? They are not on the Tower Hamlets Council’s web sites and they most certainly have not appeared anywhere in the ‘East End Lies’. So where are they?
Questions to ‘cllr’ Abbas Uddin 'Helal'
1. Why did you sign the ‘letter’ published in the London evening standard in February 2004 about Crossrail? That letter was a pack of speculative lies as it made definite assertions about benefits to be brought to the East End of London. Why did you sign it without there being any evidence whatever to justify the pack of CrossRail hole plot lies? 2. why did you stay silent for years despite there being open and repeated questions raised in the community bout tower hamlets council being party to the lying plot for Crossrail hole in the east end? 3. Why have you stayed silent and why have you not answered the questions that have been put to you in writing for the past three years asking you to explain why you said to certain members of the local community that the Crossrail plot was a ‘good’ thing? What evidence has there been to substantiate that false claim? 4. Do you oppose council corruption? Do you know that there is serious concern in the community about council corruption? Do you support the campaign for the rooting out of corruption in tower hamlets council? if your answers to these are in the affirmative then why have you not come forward to sup[port the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the abuse of tower hamlets council funding ‘powers’ and ‘facilities’ to get the local community to ‘accept’ the CROSSRAIL lying hole scheme? 5. Are you in possession of information about Crossrail that you have not shared with the local community? We are asserting that you are in possession of information about Crossrail that you have not shared with the community in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area. We are also asserting that you have not shared the information with the local community because to share the information with the community would have affected your own personal interests. 6. We are saying that you have conspired or plotted or made deals with Christine Gilbert while you held the post of ‘leader’ to frustrate the local community and to deny the community the information to all the deals and contacts that had been taking place and those that had taken place between you and the Crossrail promoters. 7. We are saying that you deliberately and on purpose suppressed the information and deprived the local community of the access to the information about all the relevant contacts and deals and discussions about the Tower Hamlets Council’s role and in the matter of the Crossrail plot against the East End of London. 8. That you abused your position on the Crossrail committee of councillors and that your abuse was similar to the other abuses in that the abuses were intended to allow you to gain or to continue to gain personally and also to deny the local community knowledge of or access to the relevant information about your role, the role of the Tower Hamlets Council and the roles being played by Christine Gilbert and your co-members on the Crossrail committee in making the CrossRail hole plot effective against the local community. 9. That you, ‘cllr Abbas’ took part in the effective collusion against the community for the abuse of the ‘East End Life’ and for the turning of it into the East End Lies on all matters to do with the abuses by councillors of the powers and the facilities of the Council where those related to the duties of the councillors to tell the community how the Council’s behaviour was adversely affecting the interests, the future of the community. 10. That your role on Crossrail has been against the community throughout and that your failure to answer the questions will now have to be investigated by the campaign making the overdue application to court. 11. Do you have anything to say in reply to these latest updated questions? 12. If you have anything to say, you must say so before the end of the day on Monday 24 July 2006 From the previous editions
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London - Court actions – updates
Arguments against those Five Tower Hamlets Councillors and their ‘chief executive’ Christine Gilbert – how they let the East End down and how they lied and failed to do their job of defending the East End against the CrossRail hole attacks – latest Khoodeelaar legal action commentary By© Muhammad Haque0950 Hrs GMT London Sunday 23 July 2006
Five Tower Hamlets Councillors were put on a ‘committee’ that was mentioned in a report in October 2004 as being ‘responsible’ for the Council’s position on the Crossrail plan. Those councillors included Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ or Helal Abbas, then ‘leader’ of the Tower Hamlets Council. Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ is relevant because he is ‘a councillor for the Council ward that included the main target of the Crossrail hole attack on the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area’. The other councillors will be discussed later. In this legal update, the key argument against Abbas Uddin Helal in court will include the fact that he failed to represent the facts of the Council’s role on Crossrail to the community. He also failed to represent the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole attacks plan back to the Council.He also failed to tell the community the facts of what the Council was actually doing. In fact, the allegations against Abbas Uddin Helal have been so comprehensive on the matter of the CrossRail hole plot that in our voluntary compliance with the rules of natural justice, we have given Abbas Uddin Helal countless opportunities to put to us his truthful, complete, factual and honest responses to the many questions. He has so far [that is at 0950 hrs GMT Sunday 23 July 2006] failed to do so. As the court applications against him and against his co-Crossrail hole plan committee councillors are due to start, we have today arranged for one last opportunity to be given to Abbas Uddin Helal to provide the replies to the questions that we have repeatedly and variously put to him.With or without his replies, the court applications against him and his fellow members of the Council’s ‘Crossrail’ “sub committee’’ [of October 2004] will go ahead. Details of the action will be posted here in due courseKhoodeelaar! Court actions update on Christine Gilbert, ‘chief executive’ London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Muhammad Haque
9th Edition published from London at 2100 Hrs GMT / 2200 Hrs UK time on Tuesday 25 July 2006
AADHIKAR means RIGHTS. It is a transAsian word, devised into English by the Editor in 1980 when founding the publication that was initially a printed weekly published from London E1. AADHIKARonline is part of the AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION London UK. The entirety of the journalistic and historic creations of the Foundation is dedicated to the cause of education. No part of these materials must be used for commercial, trading, bartering or similar aims objects or purposes whatever. ALL materials carried here are originally created as and when they are published [or as they are dated and timed. These editions are being published from the East End of London in association with the KHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN FOR THE DEFENCE OF THE BRICK LANE AND WHITECHAPEL LONDON E1 AREA and for that of the rest of the East End of London from the attacks plotted in and represented by the CrossRail hole Bill, currently being passed through the UK House of Commons. AADHIKARonline has been published continuously in various modes and media since the very first edition printed and published on Monday 19 December 1980 and all the daily files are now archived. they are accessible by request only.
E-mail AADHIKARonline HERE
AADHIKARonline
London Tuesday 25 July 2006
publishing programme during Tuesday 25 July 2006
Khoodeelaar! The first Response to the ‘announcement of interim decisions’ by the Crossrail hole Bill Select Committee of MPs in the UK House of Commons on Tuesday 25 July 2006 Khoodeelaar! constitutional law challenge UPDATE at 2100 Hrs GMT Tuesday 25 July 2006 to Crossrail hole Bill Minister – [Transport Department urges Khoodeelaar! for delay in filing court case ] [A report on that to be posted here on Wednesday 26 July 2006]
By Muhammad Haque, 2050 Hrs GMT Tuesday 25 July 2006Brick Lane London E1
The Court challenge against the CrossRail hole Bill is now going to include in the same application a series of claims against the UK House of Commons Crossrail hole Bill Select Committee. This follows the availability, this evening [25 July 2006] of the evidence of the crassness with which the ‘Crossrail Bill ‘Select committee has been abused by the promoters of the crass CrossRail plot.As I pointed out way back in January 2006, when even the local MP George Galloway was himself absent from this constituency, and neither the ‘local press’ nor the ‘opposition councillors’ on the then Tower Hamlets Council nor any holder of any other ‘elected office’ in the name of this area was saying anything of substance in the context of the plot by Crossrail against the Eats End of London, the Blair regime’s appointment of the token ‘select committee’ was not at all acceptable as evidence of any sustainable claim that the UK Parliament was acting in a constitutionally sovereign way. legitimate, independent or sovereign way that Dicey had sought to paint it to be prone to be doing at most times >br>Having suffered the further spectacles of the illegitimate behaviour by the Crossrail plot promoters in Committee Room 5 ['Palace of Westminster' !] during June 2006 [which was when I had to do some necessary field work that included my witnessing of some of the typical antics of the illegitimate Crossrail hole plot actors], I can now see just why we have to mount the wider programme of legal challenges via the UK courts against the CrossRail hole plotters than we ourselves had thought would be adequate for the defence of the area against this assault when we first worked out the ways in which we would stop the CrossRail attacks on the community. The contents of the relevant ‘decisions’ as ‘announced’ by the crassrail Bill Select committee of MPs today show that far from being interested in hearing what we the community know should be acceptable or would be necessary for our economic, our society, our environment in this ciont4ext, the select committee of MPs has been exposed as the sham that it was from the word go when Tony Blair had had it set up. In the next part of this response to today’s 'Select Committee ‘announcement’ I go into each segment and item of the ‘decisions’ as those affect the future of the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area. I shall then focus on the NEWER expansion of the City of London takeover of the East End that is being facilitated via the same controlling corrupt clique now ‘representing the present Tower Hamlets doing the imposition of the CrossRail hole attack on this area.[To be continued]
From the previous editions:
By Muhammad Haque0540 Hrs GMT Tuesday 25 July 2006
Khoodeelaar! Court action challenging the abuse of the constitution by the Crossrail hole plotters in the Government and in the CLRL company and in the Crossrail Bill ‘select committee’ bureaucracy – updates here during the day
Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique abuses the local community – again. This time its is staging another typically corrupt, inadequate, misleading INSULTATION at the idiotically named Idea Store at Whitechapel on Thursday [27 July 2006] – detailed commentary here shortly
Further KHOODEELAAR! legal questions for ‘Chief Executive’ Christine Gilbert to answer as part of the Khoodeelaar! Claims against her in court – updates here during the day Tuesday 25 July 2006
What crass stunt for Crossrail are we in for during today, Tuesday 25 July 2006 ! – enough of an alert for all visitors to this site and related web sites! Are we all in for another little surprise before the day is out, in the normal plot of things in this context ? !!!
VIEW another page from a recent edition of AADHIKARonline by CLICKING HERE
Files posted on this site are deleted or archived regularly. To access older files, please contact us by e-mail with requests for specific date and topicFrom previous editions as published on 24 July 2006
Monday 24 July 2006
Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill news, events and legal action updates
How Tower Hamlets Council ‘chief executive’ Christine Gilbert lied! How her lying antics were exposed by CBRUK and faced with the challenge caused by her initial backing for the lying role for Crossrail hole plot as played by Michael Keith, Christine Gilbert abused her ‘position’ again and prejudicially, illegally, unlawfully ordered employees concerned of Tower Hamlets Council to obstruct Khoodeelaar! campaign and legal action communications about her [Christine Gilbert's] lying behaviour in backing the CrossRail hole plot against the East End of London
Updates on the Khoodeelaar! court action scheduled to be filed this week
How Councillor Abbas Uddin Helal backed the Crossrail whole project. How he lied against the campaigners. How he lied to the local community in the Brick lane and Whitechapel area and said that the Crossrail hole plot was a ‘good’ plot against the local community! How Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ jumped on the liar mayor Ken Livingstone’s Crossrail-hole bandwagon and signed the lying ‘letter’ in the Evening Standard in February 2004
London Monday 24 July 2006 THE AUTHOR/LCAN 200 IN ASSOCIATION WITH KHOODEELAAR! THE BRICK LANE AND WHIETECHAPEL LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL Legal action - final demand to Christine Gilbert and ‘cllr. Abbas’ for answers to questions about CROSSRAIL HOLE attacks role 24 July 2006 You have been asked questions about the incidents of your making false and untrue and untruthful statements about CrossRail plot against the east end of London. Those questions have been put to you at various times in the past 32 months.
Questions that have been put to Christine Gilbert, ‘chief executive’ of the LONDON BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL have included these1. The questions as put to you by CBRUK in February 2004, March 2004 and April 2004. 2. Why did you write to CBRUK that you had the minutes that showed that the CBRUK assertion that Michael Keith had misrepresented the position of the community was not accurate? 3. If you had the minutes, were those minutes ‘secret’? if they were ‘secret’ then how could you mention those to CBRUK who had made public statement about the publicly established role for CrossRail hole plot as played by Michael Keith? 4. Where are those minutes? 5. What did you ever understand about the community, let alone about its position on anything? 6. what legal justification is there for your continuing to abuse your employment in the LBTH [London Borough of Tower Hamlets] council to violate the rights of the local community and to make it ever more susceptible to attacks, takeovers by big business and interests that have no intention or likelihood of doing anything whatever that significantly makes any positive, lasting, necessary difference to the quality of life for the vast majority of the people who make up the community on whose behalf and in whose interests the Khoodeelaar! Campaign has existed and campaign against your role for Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London? 7. Where are those minutes? They are not on the Tower Hamlets Council’s web sites and they most certainly have not appeared anywhere in the ‘East End Lies’. So where are they?
Questions to ‘cllr’ Abbas Uddin 'Helal'
1. Why did you sign the ‘letter’ published in the London evening standard in February 2004 about Crossrail? That letter was a pack of speculative lies as it made definite assertions about benefits to be brought to the East End of London. Why did you sign it without there being any evidence whatever to justify the pack of CrossRail hole plot lies? 2. why did you stay silent for years despite there being open and repeated questions raised in the community bout tower hamlets council being party to the lying plot for Crossrail hole in the east end? 3. Why have you stayed silent and why have you not answered the questions that have been put to you in writing for the past three years asking you to explain why you said to certain members of the local community that the Crossrail plot was a ‘good’ thing? What evidence has there been to substantiate that false claim? 4. Do you oppose council corruption? Do you know that there is serious concern in the community about council corruption? Do you support the campaign for the rooting out of corruption in tower hamlets council? if your answers to these are in the affirmative then why have you not come forward to sup[port the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the abuse of tower hamlets council funding ‘powers’ and ‘facilities’ to get the local community to ‘accept’ the CROSSRAIL lying hole scheme? 5. Are you in possession of information about Crossrail that you have not shared with the local community? We are asserting that you are in possession of information about Crossrail that you have not shared with the community in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area. We are also asserting that you have not shared the information with the local community because to share the information with the community would have affected your own personal interests. 6. We are saying that you have conspired or plotted or made deals with Christine Gilbert while you held the post of ‘leader’ to frustrate the local community and to deny the community the information to all the deals and contacts that had been taking place and those that had taken place between you and the Crossrail promoters. 7. We are saying that you deliberately and on purpose suppressed the information and deprived the local community of the access to the information about all the relevant contacts and deals and discussions about the Tower Hamlets Council’s role and in the matter of the Crossrail plot against the East End of London. 8. That you abused your position on the Crossrail committee of councillors and that your abuse was similar to the other abuses in that the abuses were intended to allow you to gain or to continue to gain personally and also to deny the local community knowledge of or access to the relevant information about your role, the role of the Tower Hamlets Council and the roles being played by Christine Gilbert and your co-members on the Crossrail committee in making the CrossRail hole plot effective against the local community. 9. That you, ‘cllr Abbas’ took part in the effective collusion against the community for the abuse of the ‘East End Life’ and for the turning of it into the East End Lies on all matters to do with the abuses by councillors of the powers and the facilities of the Council where those related to the duties of the councillors to tell the community how the Council’s behaviour was adversely affecting the interests, the future of the community. 10. That your role on Crossrail has been against the community throughout and that your failure to answer the questions will now have to be investigated by the campaign making the overdue application to court. 11. Do you have anything to say in reply to these latest updated questions? 12. If you have anything to say, you must say so before the end of the day on Monday 24 July 2006 From the previous editions
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London - Court actions – updates
Arguments against those Five Tower Hamlets Councillors and their ‘chief executive’ Christine Gilbert – how they let the East End down and how they lied and failed to do their job of defending the East End against the CrossRail hole attacks – latest Khoodeelaar legal action commentary By© Muhammad Haque0950 Hrs GMT London Sunday 23 July 2006
Five Tower Hamlets Councillors were put on a ‘committee’ that was mentioned in a report in October 2004 as being ‘responsible’ for the Council’s position on the Crossrail plan. Those councillors included Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ or Helal Abbas, then ‘leader’ of the Tower Hamlets Council. Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ is relevant because he is ‘a councillor for the Council ward that included the main target of the Crossrail hole attack on the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area’. The other councillors will be discussed later. In this legal update, the key argument against Abbas Uddin Helal in court will include the fact that he failed to represent the facts of the Council’s role on Crossrail to the community. He also failed to represent the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole attacks plan back to the Council.He also failed to tell the community the facts of what the Council was actually doing. In fact, the allegations against Abbas Uddin Helal have been so comprehensive on the matter of the CrossRail hole plot that in our voluntary compliance with the rules of natural justice, we have given Abbas Uddin Helal countless opportunities to put to us his truthful, complete, factual and honest responses to the many questions. He has so far [that is at 0950 hrs GMT Sunday 23 July 2006] failed to do so. As the court applications against him and against his co-Crossrail hole plan committee councillors are due to start, we have today arranged for one last opportunity to be given to Abbas Uddin Helal to provide the replies to the questions that we have repeatedly and variously put to him.With or without his replies, the court applications against him and his fellow members of the Council’s ‘Crossrail’ “sub committee’’ [of October 2004] will go ahead. Details of the action will be posted here in due courseKhoodeelaar! Court actions update on Christine Gilbert, ‘chief executive’ London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
